Banking as a Platform 2
Last week in Banking as  a Platform, I discussed how banks might use the platform concept (for  example as discussed by Tom Steinthal  in a post called Some  Thoughts on Platforms in Financial Services) to support radical improvements  in customer experience and service.
Tom has now replied. In a post called  Platforms  - Are They Coming, he mentions a banking product called PNC Virtual Wallet.  [PNC  Bank Takes on Mint & Quicken with PNC Virtual Wallet, NetBanker, July  14th 2008]
The NetBanker article mentions several companies offering  financial management platforms that apparently sit on top of (and aggregate)  online services from regular banks. These financial management platforms include  Geezeo, Jwaala, Mint, Wesabe. I haven't studied these in detail, but  from a quick review of the material on their respective websites they look  fairly similar, and a lot more like real platforms (according to the criteria  stated in Tom's earlier post) than PNC Virtual Wallet. Although PNC deserves  some praise for innovating at all, I can't see anything very radical in the PNC  innovation.
Among the comments to the NetBanker article, I note  contributions from Aaron Patzer (CEO of Mint) and Andrew Taylor (CTO of Jwaala).  This is not the first time these two have clashed in public: in September,  Andrew put a post onto the Jwaala blog called Hi I'm Mint.  Ugg., which prompted a robust reply from Aaron.
Behind the rivalry  between Mint and Jwaala is a fundamentally important difference in platform  strategy. Mint appears to be selling to customers - "use our platform to get a  better service over and above your existing bank accounts and other financial  service providers". Whereas Jwaala appears to be selling to banks - "use our  platform to provide better services to your customers". (Back in  2005, I noted a similar dilemma for software billing specialist LaCayla -  whether to market its services upwards or downwards. There are some complex  questions of platform strategy here, as I indicated in my post on two-sided markets over on  the Asymmetric Design blog. There are also questions of trust.)
I really  hope that innovations like these are successful, but there is a lot of work to  do. Big banks like PNC may offer a watered-down and "safe" version of the  innovation, but they might possibly have mixed feelings about the outcome.  Meanwhile we can expect a lot of exciting stuff to be produced by small  energetic companies with disputatious senior management; but it will be  interesting to see how far they get with or without the active collaboration of  any of the big banks.
